Particularly with respect to a visual warning for the driver, what type of information should a visual warning convey? NHTSA especially seeks any data related to these issues. [11] It has also been pointed out that the research on seat belt use and acceptability among drivers may not be representative of situations where multiple passengers are present and that further evaluation is warranted on the annoyance and acceptance of seat belt warnings. What is now the first option (S7.3(a)(1)) was added to S7.3 in 1991.[26]. This action is not subject to the requirements of E.O. 2015. Should NHTSA consider the same seat occupancy criteria specified in FMVSS No. The ECE regulations allow the rear seat belt warning system to incorporate a short-term and/or a long-term deactivation feature for the audible change-of-status warning. For a fuller discussion of the history of the active and passive protection requirements in FMVSS No. NHTSA surveyed (by telephone) drivers of vehicles with and without a rear seat belt warning system. 4092 0 obj <> endobj The initial audible signal must not exceed 30 seconds and the final audible signal must be at least 90 seconds. FMVSS No. We also seek comment about whether a rear seat belt warning would reliably detect a child restraint system attached by a child restraint anchorage system, or LATCH.[102]. 0000023448 00000 n Safety Belt and Helmet Use in 2002Overall Results. 0000104337 00000 n Identify the rulemaking by docket number and other identifying information (subject heading. For example, among drivers of vehicles with a rear seat belt warning, approximately 80 percent were satisfied with the system and 65 percent reported that the rear seat belt warning made it easier to encourage rear seat passengers to buckle up. C.) inconsistent signaling In 2010, the agency published a Request for Comments (RFC) on the petition. When prescribing such standards, the Secretary must consider all relevant, available motor vehicle safety information. A sequential logic system would require that the belt be buckled after the seat has been occupied in order for the system to recognize the seat belt as being buckled; An occupant buckles the seat belt behind themselves. 0000009615 00000 n [47] Rear seat belts are generally required except in certain buses (such as school buses) between 10,000 lb and 26,000 lb, and for school, perimeter, and transit buses over 26,000 lb. 6. When you send a comment containing information claimed to be confidential business information, you should include a cover letter setting forth the information specified in our confidential business information regulation (49 CFR part 512). First, it conducted the multi-phase seat belt Start Printed Page 51088warning study that was part of the research program initiated pursuant to SAFETEA-LU. No visual signal is required if all the rear occupants are belted. 7. 15. It also recommended that Congress amend the Safety Act to eliminate the 8-second limit on the length of the audible warning. NHTSA also seeks comment on the technological and economic feasibility of alternative rear seat belt warning systems. [84] It is not an official legal edition of the Federal the most extreme example of aggressive driving is called: No passing to the left shall be done when, Both These part-time non-users might be amenable to strategies to increase seat belt use. The European Union is set to adopt an updated version of Regulation No. 0000043729 00000 n 8. We are aware that implementing a visual warning may require physical redesign of the instrument panel. The Committee also requested that the study consider potential legislative and regulatory actions to facilitate installation of devices to encourage seat belt use. The current driver's belt warning requirements specify that a belt is not in use when, at the option of the manufacturer, either the seat belt latch mechanism is not fastened or the belt is not extended at least 10.16 centimeters (cm) (4 inches (in)) from its stowed position. NHTSA continued and expanded on this work several years later. L. 112-141) directs the Secretary[5] 20. The National Child Restraint Use Special Study found that only 13 percent of drivers reported reading the vehicle owner's manual. TRUE B.) . ]';~,v7['.v&Z-Mf]PGW#^fU;$Q:FHo>qhp-^J9M0*EIdCH_"g2Zd\nJCCPbk+3n*]*1n-J"HMrGR> 3H^ V)FaV"kh documents in the last year, by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration 2008. In light of Congress's repeal of this restriction, NHTSA seeks comment on removing the corresponding provision in FMVSS No. European New Car Assessment Programme Assessment ProtocolSafety Assist, 3.3.2. [88] 4092 81 Developing appropriate attitudes depends on recognizing that attitudes are: Approximately 100,000 police-reported crashes annually involve drowsiness and fatigue as a principal casual factor. On November 21, 2007, Public Citizen and Advocates for Highway and Auto Safety (petitioners) petitioned NHTSA to amend FMVSS No. The rele- See 76 FR 53102 (Aug. 25, 2011) (denial of a petition for rulemaking to mandate the installation of three-point seat belts for all seating positions on all school buses). First, it repeals the statutory provision that prohibited NHTSA from requiring or specifying as a compliance option an audible seat belt warning lasting longer than 8 seconds. xref 0000057688 00000 n Failure to have windshield wipers. 208 requires the air bag system to be active during several static tests using a 5th percentile adult female dummy in the right front passenger seat. Accordingly, NHTSA might need to propose seat occupancy criteria. Euro NCAP introduced SBRS bonus points in 2002. The Euro NCAP protocol for Safety Assist systems describes which features a seat belt reminder must have to qualify for extra points. There are a variety of aspects of the possible proposed requirements that we seek comment on. 66. 0000031738 00000 n 54, 57. Petitioners asserted that rear seat belt warnings would save hundreds of lives each year and that a large percentage of the lives saved would be children. NHTSA also seeks comment on whether an audible warning alone, without a visual warning, would be an effective way to alert the driver to the status of the rear seat belts and increase rear seat belt use. Web(SHSP) is to reach zero fatalities. In particular, continuous buzzers and ignition interlocks annoyed many consumers to the point of their disabling or circumventing the systems. Explain why the water at geysers and some springs is hot. NHTSA has granted Public Citizen and Advocates for Highway and Auto Safety's petition. Rear seats are frequently used for child restraint systems attached by a child restraint anchorage system, or LATCH. 16. Special Report 278 at 18, Committee for the Safety Belt Technology Study, Transportation Research Board of The National Academies (2003) [hereinafter Transportation Research Board Study]. [77] However, occupant detection for the rear seats may present both technical and cost challenges. 0000190039 00000 n This document has been published in the Federal Register. Below we seek comment on possible sample selection bias (because these survey respondents were drivers of vehicles equipped with rear seat belt warning systems). These include: The types of seat belt warning system requirements the agency should propose; the effectiveness of such systems at increasing rear seat belt use; the degree to which consumers would accept such systems; the associated benefits and costs; and the vehicles to which any proposed requirements should apply. 2015. We seek comment on these concerns, as well as other concerns. WebSingle-vehicle crashes represent the largest percentage of both unbelted KA and KABCO crashes; however, single-vehicle is over-represented in unbelted KA crashes (51.0 An occupant detection system in the rear seat may have difficulty detecting a child restraint system. NHTSA also seeks comment on whether there are alternative warning systems that would convey alternative or additional information to the driver (or rear passengers). Regulatory History of Automatic Crash Protection in FMVSS 208. Webbelted and unbelted occupants. To what extent would a deactivation feature reduce the effectiveness of the warning? on For example, for the static suppression and low-risk deployment compliance options, FMVSS No. Because of the detail of the data gathered (e.g., occupant demographic and vehicle-specific information), the analysis was able to control for confounding factors. 0000043267 00000 n We seek comment on whether NHTSA should propose requirements to address circumvention. 208, Occupant crash protection, to require a seat belt use warning system for rear seats. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, p. 89. The current driver's seat belt visual warning is required to last at least 60 seconds under the second compliance option. We also note that school buses of all sizes offer passengers compartmentalization protection to reduce the risk of crash injury, even to the unbelted. [73] [25] 27. 30111, to submit a report to Congress describing the reasons for not prescribing such a standard. 18. DOT HS 812 593). For example, approximately 80 percent of drivers of vehicles with a rear seat belt warning were satisfied with the system and 65 percent of drivers of vehicles equipped with rear seat belt reminders reported that the rear seat belt reminder made it easier to encourage rear seat passengers to buckle up.[4]. Under 49 U.S.C. approaching or upon the crest of a grade Survey of Principal Drivers of Vehicles with a Rear Seat Belt Reminder System. NHTSA seeks comment on, among other things, potential requirements for such systems, the vehicles to which they should apply, their effectiveness, the likely consumer acceptance, and the associated costs and benefits. a) a good level of attention 0000002926 00000 n Seat belts are effective in most types of crashes. Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, p. 47. Although NHTSA did not previously have the authority to require, or specify as a compliance option, a seat belt warning with an audible signal lasting more than 8 seconds, the agency facilitated the voluntary adoption of enhanced warnings through a series of legal interpretations that determined that the Safety Act did not prohibit manufacturers from using enhanced warning systems (e.g., systems with audible warnings that lasted more than 8 seconds) as long as the manufacturer differentiated the voluntarily-provided signal from the required signal (for example, by a clearly distinguishable lapse in time between the two signals). documents in the last year, 295 [48] (Below we also seek comment on alternative non-traditional approaches.) Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, pp. We will consider all comments received before the close of business on the comment closing date indicated above under DATES. Paul Schroeder & Melanie Wilbur. If the docket receives a comment too late for us to consider in developing a final rule (assuming that one is issued), we will consider that comment as an informal suggestion for future rulemaking action. Federal Register. The Public Inspection page may also documents in the last year, 931 For rear seats, a visual signal must start once the ignition switch is engaged. 68. Charles J. Kahane. Using a seat belt is one of the most effective actions a motor vehicle occupant can take to prevent death and injury in a crash. on Survey of Principal Drivers of Vehicles with a Rear Seat Belt Reminder System. DOT HS 810 975. Should the warning be visual-only, audible-only, or audio-visual? On the basis of the general solubility rules given in Table 7.1, predict which of the following substances are likely to be appreciably soluble in water. These markup elements allow the user to see how the document follows the and services, go to (MAP-21 also repeals a statutory provision that prohibited NHTSA from requiring or specifying as a compliance option an audible seat belt warning lasting longer than 8 seconds.) See also Paul Schroeder & Melanie Wilbur. Explain why you agree or disagree, suggest alternatives, and substitute language for your requested changes. If the change of status occurs below 25 km/h and no doors are opened, the signal may be delayed until the vehicle has been in motion for 500 meters. NHTSA also seeks comment on removing the driver's seat belt warning audible signal duration upper limit. Collisions on city streets are largely at intersections because of lane changing, running or jumping lights. This series of research studies showed, among other things, that the presence of an enhanced front seat belt reminder system increased front outboard passenger seat belt use by about 3 to 4 percentage points more than in vehicles with only a driver seat belt warning system meeting the minimum requirements in S7.3. You may also see the comments on the internet. To prevent unnecessary signals, the system must also be capable of detecting whether the front passenger seat is occupied. Prior to the enactment of MAP-21, the agency could not require the audible warning to operate for more than 8 seconds. Although it is of no doubt that the use of seatbelt reduces the incidence and severity of MVC-induced TLJ injury, how it is protective for front-seat occupants of an automobile after rollover crashes is unclear. How can I read the comments submitted by other people? 30111. 208. 208, see Stephen R. Kratzke. All of these manufacturers' rear seat belt warning systems use a display that is visible to the driver and indicates which rear seat belts are in use, as well as employing a change-of-status reminder that has visual and audible components. A.) 04/28/2023, 39 [Found in the docket for this ANPRM.]. These tools are designed to help you understand the official document To ensure that your comments are considered by the agency, make sure to submit them by the comment period deadline identified in the. [19], The standard currently requires a seat belt warning for the driver's seat belt on passenger cars;[20] 0000116003 00000 n The front occupant visual signal must remain active until the seat belt is fastened. In it, we seek comment on a variety of issues related to a requirement for a rear seat belt warning system, including potential requirements for such systems, the vehicles to which they should apply, their effectiveness, the likely consumer acceptance, and the associated costs and benefits. Should NHTSA retain these criteria to determine if a rear seated occupant is belted, and if not, what should the criteria be, and why? documents in the last year, 1008 We also seek comment on whether we should propose requiring a single-trip manual deactivation of the seat belt warning system once the minimal signal performance requirements are met, which might diminish the likelihood of circumvention. The report noted that many part-time users interviewed by NHTSAthe primary target group for the technologywere receptive to the new systems. Advance notice of proposed rulemaking (ANPRM). [49] 208 in 1974 to require that only the driver seating position be equipped with a seat belt warning system providing a visual and audible warning, with the audible warning not lasting longer than eight seconds. 208 does not require this. NHTSA, therefore, seeks comment on the potential benefits and costs of the different types of rear seat belt warning system discussed in this notice, including those that provide a warning similar to the kinds of seat belt warnings that are provided in current-production vehicles in the United States or elsewhere in the world, as well as other potentially novel approaches. they also present potential consumer acceptance challenges for the same reasons. If NHTSA were to propose requirements for a warning that is similar to existing seat belt warnings, should the warning be visual-only (e.g., a telltale displaying text or icons), audio-only, or audio-Start Printed Page 51083visual? It directs the Secretary to either issue a final rule, or, if the Secretary determines that such an amendment does not meet the requirements and considerations of 49 U.S.C. NHTSA could potentially establish criteria in NCAP for rear seat belt warning systems as it does for other vehicle safety features. 2015. NHTSA is considering proposing any of a variety of minimum requirements for a rear seat belt warning system. Is this an appropriate threshold? 208, as well as twenty different enhanced warning systems. Unattended vehicles are subject to be towed at the motor vehicle owners and/or operators sole expense and liability.. European New Car Assessment Programme Assessment ProtocolSafety Assist, 3.3. Note that all comments received will be posted without change to http://www.regulations.gov,, including any personal information provided.
Bald Black Female Singer 90s,
Nathan Cooper Obituary,
Articles U
