The PubMed wordmark and PubMed logo are registered trademarks of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). 0000075811 00000 n J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2009,18(6):920926. official website and that any information you provide is encrypted Harris, S.R. The UEFI has been adapted into other languages including Turkish, French Canadian and Spanish. Binkley JM, Stratford P, Kirkpatrick S, Farley CR, Okoli J, Gabram S. Clin Breast Cancer. For the patients who rated their arm status after surgery as better ("much better" and "somewhat better") and as "unchanged," the difference in area under ROC curves for DASH & QuickDASH=0.01, indicating excellent convergent validity with the DASH, as there is no ability to discriminate a difference between the 2 groups. The factor structure has also been challenged [2123] which further questions validity. 6, e1261-7. J Occup Environ Med 1997,39(12):11951202. Cite this article. HHS Vulnerability Disclosure, Help Conclusions: }Z:d2]l@sS$2fQBQE&0bNJ-%+(5s6`[RbP=u[[bl=. ; Lim, J.-Y. Unauthorized use of these marks is strictly prohibited. 10.1016/j.apmr.2008.06.024, Terwee CB, Bot SD, de Boer MR, van der Windt DA, Knol DL, Dekker J, Bouter LM, de Vet HC: Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. The UEFI is easy to administer as it is a self-reported questionnaire. The psychometric properties of the Spanish version of the ULFI are reported here for the first time. It was initially published in a dichotomous format [6] then updated and modified to a three-point scale [7]. Gencay Can, A.; Can, S.S.; Ekiolu, E.; akc, F.A. The ULFI was translated and back translated with consideration of the Spanish cultural linguistic adaptation to provide the new ULFI-Sp questionnaire without language difficulties or other conceptual misunderstanding. %PDF-1.3 Please note that many of the page functionalities won't work as expected without javascript enabled. 0000080372 00000 n analysis was performed as described by Stratford [32]. CAS Factors Associated with Upper Limb Function in Breast Cancer Survivors. Med Care. qw7dNKN}@"z`T|^$-E-qXsV\|e6E&%X]=8\EN@LqS;2r>/Q)esC7w+t#?r8YxqL,L'3'7_3f5b&@n]YE+J_KI"t96NE}e ~>|O2*M&oRo|U9]'' %? Int J Environ Res Public Health. Please provide an answer for each activity. 0000004613 00000 n 0000079670 00000 n The study limitations include the lack of longitudinal data regarding other psychometric properties including responsiveness or sensitivity to change and error scores as a representation of a minimal clinically important difference. California Privacy Statement, 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.03.012, Lehman LA, Woodbury M, Velozo CA: Examination of the factor structure of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire. ; Osborne, J.W. Two of the three other critical psychometric properties of the ULFI-Sp were both shown to be high and well supported. J Clin Epidemiol 2007, 60: 3442. Cuesta-Vargas, A.I. Gabel CP, Melloh M, Burkett B, Michener L: The Lower Limb Functional Index: development and validation of the clinimetric properties and practical characteristics. 2022 Oct 26;93(5):e2022307. sharing sensitive information, make sure youre on a federal It was shown to have strong psychometric properties for reliability, validity, responsiveness, error measurement, and internal consistency that approximated or exceeded those of the DASH and UEFS [6]. 2023 Jan 19;7(1):100051. doi: 10.1016/j.rpth.2023.100051. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2023 Jan 16;4:1089748. doi: 10.3389/fpain.2023.1089748. future research directions and describes possible research applications. The ULFI with a three-point option improved both the responsiveness and practicality [7]. eCollection 2023 Jan. Phys Ther. Though various region specific PROs have been used to assess upper-limb functional status, it is accepted that there is no gold standard [8, 1012]. ; Gabel, P.C. S3S11. 2014 Jun 27;12:96. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-12-96. The one-factor solution that emerged in the factor analysis accounted for 60.54% of the total variance. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2005,87(5):10381046. Cuesta-Vargas, A.I. Reliability was performed using the Intraclass Correlation Coefficients Type 2,1 (ICC2.1) test-retest methodology in a randomly selected subgroup of the full sample (n=35, 4662years, 61.1% female). Cuesta-Vargas, A.I., Gabel, P.C. Check out the 12 tools and questionnaires you should use to assess the upper limb in neurorehabilitation such as . Psicothema 2013, 25: 151157. When referring to upper extremity musculoskeletal impairments, this concerns the shoulder, elbow, wrist and hand areas. This consisted of a payment for the author, CRJ, as a physical therapist in the assessment. J. Environ. ; Tekindal, A. Cross-Cultural Adaptation, Reliability and Validity of the Turkish Version of the Upper Limb Functional Index (ULFI). Upper Extremity Musculoskeletal DisordersGummesson (2006) . 10.1016/S0894-1130(01)80036-3, Article Epub 2018 Feb 21. Roldn-Jimnez, C.; Martn-Martn, J.; Pajares, B.; Ribelles, N.; Alba, E.; Cuesta-Vargas, A.I. eCollection 2023 Jan. Tudini F, Levine D, Healy M, Jordon M, Chui K. Front Pain Res (Lausanne). Qual Life Res 2009,18(8):10431051. Visit our dedicated information section to learn more about MDPI. Criterion validity with the EQ-5D-3 L was fair and inversely correlated (r = -0.59). Any study using confirmatory factor analysis would be advantageous. ; Bartlett, M.S. Epub 2013 Jun 27. 0000078184 00000 n Reliability and validity of two versions of the upper extremity functional index. These regional PRO measures are argued to provide greater sensitivity and improved representation of the individuals functional status than joint or condition specific measures [79]. A total of 126 volunteers (4921years, 54.8% female) with a variety of upper limb conditions of >12weeks duration were recruited consecutively from the Physical Therapy Clinic at the Malaga University. Sensors (Basel). Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for the publication of this report. The Upper Extremity Functional Index (UEFI) is a patient reported outcome measure used to assess the functional impairment in individuals with musculoskeletal upper limb dysfunction. Scree Plot of the exploratory one-factor solution. An official website of the United States government. On a calcul le rsultat du questionnaire IFMS-15 partir de questions pertinentes contenues dans la version IFMS-20. Criterion validity determined from the relationship between the ULFI-Sp and EQ-5D-3L (r=0.59) and EQ-5D-3L-VAS (r=0.51) indicated a fair and inverse correlation. Mthodes : Les adultes ayant une dysfonction des membres suprieurs (MS) ont rpondu au questionnaire IFMS-20, aux questionnaires de l'chelle fonctionnelle des membres suprieurs (EFMS), de l'chelle de limitation de la douleur et de l'chelle de l'intensit de la douleur au cours de leurs premires valuations en physiothrapie (moment 1); de 24 48 heures plus tard (moment 2) et 3 semaines aprs le dbut du traitement ou le cong, selon l'chance la plus rapproche (moment 3). 0000075968 00000 n The MDC Garratt A. There are currently two versions of the upper extremity functional index; UEFI 20-item and UEFI 15-item. [Epub ahead of print], PROQoLD website. HHS Vulnerability Disclosure, Help 0000074780 00000 n The upper limb functional index is broadly used outcome measure for musculoskeletal disorders of the upper limb. La validit longitudinale a t dtermine en fonction du lien (r de Pearson) entre les scores de changement de la fonction et de la douleur (moment 1moment 3). 10.2522/ptj.20100199, Lehman LA, Sindhu BS, Shechtman O, Romero S, Velozo CA: A comparison of the abiity of two upper extremity assessments to measure change in function. Traditionally, clinical signs and symptoms were used as outcomes and studies that wished to reflect patient health status employed generic quality of life measures. The Upper Limb Functional Index: Development and Determination of Reliability, Validity, and Responsiveness. Jill M. Binkley, Paul Stratford, Stephanie Kirkpatrick,Clara R. Farley, Joel Okoli, Sheryl Gabram Estimating the Reliability and Validity of the Upper Extremity Functional Index in Women After Breast Cancer Surgery. Furthermore, as a new short version was developed, future studies should also address the correlation between the ULFI-Sp short version and different reduced versions of questionnaires, such as the QuickDASH or QuickDASH-9, in the BCS population. The screeplot (see Figure2) indicated a one-factor solution. In order to be human-readable, please install an RSS reader. Correspondence to Writingoriginal draft preparation: J.M.-M. Patient reported outcome (PRO) measures [1, 2] are primarily used to objectively reflect a patients health or functional status at any given time and to detect changes in this status as a response to an intervention [3]. 0000093539 00000 n 0000071853 00000 n National Library of Medicine 0000004577 00000 n Larsson, I.L. Validation of a Spanish version of the Spine Functional Index. Implementation of a Standard Care Program of Therapeutic Exercise in Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2007,15(2):126134. 0000098321 00000 n CAS In light of the present results, the developed version of the ULFI-SP is preferable to assess the upper limb function in Spanish women after breast cancer surgery. 0000079974 00000 n A physical therapy outpatients population was used for evaluation of the ULFI-Sps four critical psychometric properties. 10.2106/JBJS.D.02060, Beaton DE, Katz JN, Fossel AH, Wright JG, Tarasuk V, Bombardier C: Measuring the whole or the parts? Clipboard, Search History, and several other advanced features are temporarily unavailable. Terms and Conditions, Bone Joint Surg Am 2012,94(3):277285. 6: 4997. sharing sensitive information, make sure youre on a federal CAS 0000073041 00000 n [1] The original UEFI consists of 20 questions on a 5- point rating scale assessing level of difficulty in performing activities of daily living using the upper extremities including household and work activities, hobbies, lifting a bag of groceries, washing your scalp, pushing up on your hands, driving etc. Stubblefield, M.D. Google Scholar. The factor structure has not been consistently shown as one-dimensional [7, 2628], which raises concerns on its validity; and it has been found to underestimate symptoms and overestimate disability [29]. The intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) and minimal detectable change (MDC) quantified test-retest reliability (Time 1-Time 2). Clinicians may assess the upper limbs after breast cancer. 0000083850 00000 n In the same study, the longitudinal validity coefficient between the UEFI and the UEFS was 0.74. Clipboard, Search History, and several other advanced features are temporarily unavailable. Upper Limb Disorders (ULDs) are highly prevalent even years after a diagnosis. The criterion validity demonstrated only a fair degree of differential association with the EQ-5D-3L and EQ-5D-3L-VAS. 0000083070 00000 n The ULFI-Sp showed no missing responses and showed a high degree of internal consistency, as illustrated by the high Cronbach value (=0.94) with an individual item range of 0.92 to 0.96. ; Amadio, P.C. 10.2310/6640.2004.15377. ; Rapport, F.; Russell, I.T. Descriptive analyses were applied to calculate means and standard deviations of demographic variables (Table1). FOIA London: SAGE Publications Ltd; 2005. 1173185, Stratford PW, Binkley JM, Stratford DM. In a study by Stratford et al[1], comparing Upper Extremity Functional Index (UEFI 20- item) and the Upper Extremity Functional Scale (UEFS), the discriminant cross-sectional validity of the UEFI was found to be 6.65 with p = .003 while the convergent cross-sectional validity coefficient between the UEFI and the UEFS was 0.82. Patient-Reported Symptoms after Breast Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment: A Retrospective Cohort Study. 0000076046 00000 n The total score was accounted for, not the individual questionnaire response items. Would you like email updates of new search results? This is considered to support the criterion validity of the ULFI-Sp however as it is not as strong as findings in the previous research that used a region specific criterion standard that was advocated as representative of the upper limb kinetic chain. This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. ; van Laarhoven, H.W.M. Les valeurs du CDM se sont tablies 9,4/80 pour le questionnaire IFMS-20 et 8,8/100 pour le questionnaire IFMS-15. Breast cancer is one of the most prevalent cancers worldwide in women [, Clinicians commonly use patient-reported outcomes (PROs) to assess a patients symptoms or functional status [, In the breast cancer population, there are PROs that are used to assess the upper limbs [, The Spanish version of the ULFI has been used to analyze factors associated with the upper limb function [. Known-groups validity was evaluated with a one-way ANOVA across three levels of working status. The .gov means its official. 0000157317 00000 n The correlation between items and the regression score from MLE, communalities, and the average score for each item is shown in, Therefore, a new 14-item model (short version) was tested with those items with communalities higher than 0.3. 0000070007 00000 n SB$a% [H 909H3.JfC?TlI$suT>2$SGe4e5&q22WRb9Gap&j7O^1'gs8a 6g-N O@Wqrr:@2v-v#fy($L%kT}"m \wb'f`M%D^#a{P1$068uhv v}!-Ywe "_'[KJu9tF H!2=[))/qJ Yhh@-#e5 `h\p-..A4 7)",%vWz)'3=LZtm3]Dcz.ZC&)P[C,kG&%q(Oc8&SJ57}sN+bCiu&fo_!:. ; Bubis, L.D. 10.1157/13093053. ; Marshall, P.W.M. The purpose of study is to develop and validate a ULFI Spanish-version (ULFI-Sp). Scree Plot of the exploratory one-factor solution. 2021 Sep 20;18(18):9894 (Full text article) Spanish: ; Bartlett, M.; Bartlett, M.S. The purpose of study is to develop and. Stock SR, Streiner D: The impact of neck and upper limb musculoskeletal disorders on the lives of affected workers: development of a new functional status index. Rehabilitation of the spine: A practitioners manual. J Hand Ther 2001,14(2):128146. 8600 Rockville Pike It cannot be influenced by other constructs such as psychological or emotional status [24, 25]. Find support for a specific problem in the support section of our website. Both UEFI measures show acceptable reliability and validity. 0000156160 00000 n 0000071697 00000 n Med Clin (Barc) 1999, 112: 7985. The 15-item LEFS-Ar demonstrated evidence supporting its internal consistency, test-retest reliability and construct validity as a measure of lower extremity function in Arabic-speaking patients with lower extremity musculoskeletal disorders. Draw your signature, type it, upload its image, or use your mobile device as a signature pad. Google Scholar, Smith MV, Calfee RP, Baumgarten KM, Brophy RH, Wright RWJ: Upper extremity-specific measures of disability and outcomes in orthopaedic surgery. The procedure of cross-cultural adaptation of a scale has been used in previous studies for different scales to be applied in the Spanish context [43, 44] The inability to use the QuickDASH-Sp data collected in the clinical setting due to excessive missing responses, potentially from patient burden due to being the final questionnaire, resulted in no direct comparison with a regional upper limb criterion, a requirement for future studies. The ULFI was shown to have strong psychometric properties for reliability, validity, responsiveness, error measurement, and internal consistency that approximated or exceeded those of the DASH and UEFS [6]. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Harrington, S.; Michener, L.A.; Kendig, T.; Miale, S.; George, S.Z. ; Michener, L.A.; Melloh, M.; Burkett, B. Value Health 2002, 5: 372381. The QuickDASH, as derived from 11extracted DASH items, has also been challenged. 0000075019 00000 n A Note on the Multiplying Factors for Various Chi Square Approximations. Springer Nature. Purpose: Estimating the Reliability and Validity of the Upper Extremity Functional Index in Women After Breast Cancer Surgery. 0000071173 00000 n Implications for rehabilitation; The Extremity Function Index reflects the functioning of all muscles in the upper and lower extremities involved in activities of daily living. 8600 Rockville Pike Bejer A, Bie A, Kyc S, Lorenc M, Mataczyski P, Domka-Jopek E, Melloh M, Gabel CP. WHO | Breast Cancer: Prevention and Control. The items are arranged from most to least difficult, top to bottom. Angst F, Schwyzer HK, Aeschlimann A, Simmen BR, Goldhahn J: Measures of adult shoulder function: Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand Questionnaire (DASH) and its short version (QuickDASH), Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Society standardized shoulder assessment form, Constant (Murley) Score (CS), Simple Shoulder Test (SST), Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS), Shoulder Disability Questionnaire (SDQ), and Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI). Man Ther 2011,16(2):177182. The demographic and frequency of diagnosis of the study sample are detailed in Table1. Validation of the Upper Limb Functional Index on Breast Cancer Survivor. Flowchart of the translation of the Upper Limb Functional Index (ULFI) from English to Spanish. The KolmogorovSmirnov test by one sample (significance > 0.05) was used to calculate the samples distribution and normality. Aytar A, Yuruk ZO, Tuzun EH, Baltaci G, Karatas M, Eker L. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 0000074518 00000 n Salerno DF, Copley-Merriman C, Taylor TN, Shinogle J, Schulz RM: A review of functional status measures for workers with upper extremity disorders. The upper extremity postthrombotic syndrome score: an international Delphi consensus study to determine the score's functional disability component. The exclusion criteria were age <18years and poor Spanish language comprehension as required for the completion of the questionnaires. positive feedback from the reviewers. The developed short version of the ULFI-SP is preferable to assess upper limb function in Spanish BCS. Health outcome assessment is an important component of patient care. Changes in Unilateral Upper Limb Muscular Strength and Electromyographic Activity After a 16-Week Strength Training Intervention in Survivors of Breast Cancer. The Validation of a Quality of Life Scale to Assess the Impact of Arm Morbidity in Breast Cancer Patients Post-Operatively. 0000074700 00000 n doi: 10.1046/j.1524-4733.2002.54073.x. Methods: A two stage observational study was conducted. The ULFI has also been accepted by the international PRO database [39] PROQUOLID. Wiley: Chichester; 2000. 0000076943 00000 n Share your form with others. The factor analysis revealed a satisfactory percentage of total variance explained by the one factor at 48.9%. Measures of Adult Shoulder Function: Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand Questionnaire (DASH) and Its Short Version (QuickDASH), Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Society Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form, Constant (Murley) Score (CS), Simple Shoulder Test (SST), Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS), Shoulder Disability Questionnaire (SDQ), and Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI). Chicago: Scientific Software International; 2007. 0000080800 00000 n PMC official website and that any information you provide is encrypted 0000076897 00000 n Formal analysis: J.M.-M., A.I.C.-V. and C.R.-J. ; Dekker, J.; Bouter, L.M. The results for the psychometric properties support the findings of the previous research on the original English version of the ULFI indicating broad cross-cultural adaptions would be appropriate to other diverse cultural and linguistic groups. Prevalence of Breast Cancer Treatment Sequelae over 6 Years of Follow-up: The Pulling Through Study. Editors select a small number of articles recently published in the journal that they believe will be particularly The Upper Limb Functional Index (ULFI) has been validated across different populations and languages. The ULFI is a 25-item 3-point response option PRO that is scored by simple addition of the responses then converted to a 100 point percentage scale. 2023 BioMed Central Ltd unless otherwise stated. 0000072523 00000 n volume11, Articlenumber:126 (2013) 0000157714 00000 n Quality of Life: The Assessment, Analysis and Interpretation of Patient-Reported Outcomes, LISREL 10 for Windows [Computer Software], Functionality and Quality of Life with Parkinsons Disease after Use of a Dynamic Upper Limb Orthosis: A Pilot Study, Objectively-Assessed Ultraviolet Radiation Exposure and Sunburn Occurrence, Acceptance of CaregiverPatient Support to Latinx Coping with Advanced Cancer (CASA) Intervention: A Caregiver Case Study, Associations between Primary Healthcare Experiences and Glycemic Control Status in Patients with Diabetes: Results from the Greater Bay Area Study, China, The Role of Physical Activity in Primary Care, http://www.who.int/cancer/detection/breastcancer/en/, https://researchers.cdu.edu.au/en/studentTheses/development-and-initial-validation-of-a-new-regional-outcome-meas, http://www-01.ibm.com/software/analytics/spss/products/statistics/, https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, Assistance with personal care and hygiene, Difficult opening, holding, pushing or pressing. Reliability for the UEFI-20 and UEFI-15 was the same (ICC=0.94 for both measures). 0000129392 00000 n Polish Cross-Cultural Adaptation of the Lower Limb Functional Index (LLFI) Demonstrates a Valid Outcome Measure for the Lower Limb Region and Joints. 0000155264 00000 n : Quality of Life: Assessment, Analysis and Interpretation of Patient-reported Outcomes. An external validation scale of the EQ-5D-3L and EQ-5D-3L-VAS was used with bilateral correlations to establish if status had changed and an error range of 010% was allowed in determining the test-retest reliability. Results: 0000005536 00000 n On recommande le questionnaire IFMS-15 parce qu'il mesure une dimension seulement: la fonction des membres suprieurs. A two stage observational study was conducted involving: initial translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the ULFI [7] to Spanish; then subsequent prospective concurrent completion with a general health questionnaire, the Euroqol Health Questionnaire 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D-3L) [41] and an upper limb regional criterion, the QuickDASH-Sp [42]. 0000070836 00000 n The disability inventory consists of a gross motor function index and a . Arooj, A.; Amjad, F.; Tanveer, F.; Arslan, A.U. An official website of the United States government. No special The site is secure. articles published under an open access Creative Common CC BY license, any part of the article may be reused without The purpose of study is to develop and validate a ULFI Spanish-version (ULFI-Sp). ; Yelland, M.; Melloh, M.; Burkett, B. 476 0 obj <>stream The UEFI has been adapted into other languages including Turkish, French Canadian and Spanish. The EQ-5D-3L-Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) is used to reflect the respondents self-rated health status on a 100mm scale and ranked from Best Imaginable (100) to Worst Imaginable (0). 2013 Nov;93(11):1507-19. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20130041. Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view. 0000155188 00000 n 0000071512 00000 n The QuickDASH-Sp had greater than >30% of missing responses affecting 41 of the 126 respondent questionnaires. Ethical clearance was approved by the Tribunal of Review of Human Subjects at the University of Malaga. The authors are grateful to the volunteers for their participation and the PMDT, Malaga. 2023; 20(6):4997. Public Health 2023, 20, 4997. 0000005499 00000 n The purpose of study is to develop and validate a ULFI Spanish-version (ULFI-Sp). Part of 10.1097/JPO.0b013e3181ae974d, Fayad F, Mace Y, Lefevre-Colau MM, Poiraudeau S, Rannou F, Revel M: Measurement of shoulder disability in the athlete: a systematic review [In French]. Gabel, C.P. The exclusion criteria were under 18 years old and low reading comprehension due to completing the questionnaire. MDC values were 9.4/80 for the UEFI-20 and 8.8/100 for the UEFI-15. The .gov means its official. -, McPhail SM, Bagraith KS, Schippers M, Wells PJ, Hatton A. 18, No. The regulation of Patient-Reported Outcome claims: need for a flexible standard. The intra-class coefficient was 0.78. Before We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience. 0000084902 00000 n Cookies policy. All the authors have given final approval of the version to be published. The scale is in logits. (This article belongs to the Special Issue. Methods: Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2010,91(9):13701377. Contract N PS16060 partially funded this research project in IBIMA between NovartisIBIMA (translation research in cancer B-01 and Clinimetric F-14). Best Practices in Exploratory Factor Analysis: Four Recommendations for Getting the Most From Your Analysis. Visualization and supervision: B.P.-H. and E.A.-C. All authors: Reviewing and editing the manuscript. It is critical to employ research measures that are valid and reliable but they must also be both culturally and linguistically appropriate.
1st Battalion 2nd Field Artillery Baumholder, Germany,
Articles U
